Cybersecurity certification exam tips
Plain-English guides to passing your next CompTIA cybersecurity exam, what's tested, how to study, and how the certs compare.
Which Layer Is It? Mapping Attacks to the OSI Model, Plus IPsec AH vs. ESP
The OSI model is on every networking exam, and the CISSP is the one that asks what attacks live at each layer. All seven layers with their unit, device and protocols, the attack the exam pins to each, the TCP/IP model's four-layer collapse, and IPsec pulled apart: AH versus ESP, transport versus tunnel mode, and what IKE and the security association actually negotiate.
Read article
MITRE ATT&CK v20: What's New, and What It Means for Your Exam
Nine new Enterprise techniques, five of them about AI: prompt injection, AI-enabled exfiltration, attacks on AI-assisted defenses and poisoned AI search. Released October 13, 2026, here is every addition, where it sits in the matrix, the defenses that matter, and what changes for Security+, CySA+ and SecAI+ candidates.
Read article
VM Escape, Management Plane, Noisy Neighbor: The Cloud Threat List and the Controls CCSP Maps to Each
A director asks what happens to the shops if the provider has a very bad day, and the answer is an availability figure. That is a likelihood; the question was about impact. CCSP objectives 3.3 and 3.4: risk identification and analysis for cloud infrastructure, the threats the platform itself invites, from VM escape and hypervisor compromise to management plane abuse and noisy neighbors, the four treatment strategies, and the physical, system, virtualization, identity and audit controls the exam expects you to match to each.
Read article
Shadow AI: How Unsanctioned Tools Leak Data, and the Policy That Actually Stops It
Every organization has employees pasting company data into AI tools nobody approved. SecAI+ Domain 4 calls it shadow AI and tests it hard: the leak paths, the sanctioned versus unsanctioned and private versus public matrix, the four risks the objective names, how to discover what is already in use, and why a ban fails where a paved road works.
Read articleGet The AI Security Brief
The top AI security news, plus what matters to the C-suite. Free, straight to your inbox.
Isolate, Segment, or Remove: Containment, Eradication, and Recovery Techniques the Way CySA+ Scenarios Test Them
At 04:12 the alert says mass file modification and someone's hand is already on the power button. CySA+ objective 3.3 is the largest in Domain 3 and it is tested as scenarios: which technique, in which phase, and why. Evidence acquisition and chain of custody, isolate versus segment versus remove, reimaging versus patching, restoring from backup, and the scoping and impact questions that decide the answer.
Read article
SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and Friends: The Enterprise Security Capabilities Security+ Expects You to Configure
Objective 4.5 is where Security+ stops asking what a control is and starts asking where it goes. Email authentication drawn as one flow (SPF checks the sender, DKIM signs the message, DMARC decides what happens), web and DNS filtering, DLP and what it can actually see, EDR versus XDR, NAC posture checks, file integrity monitoring, and the placement map that answers every scenario in the objective.
Read article
Uptime Tiers, N+1 vs. 2N, Pilot Light vs. Warm Standby: Designing for Failure in the Cloud
In the cloud, the question is not whether something will fail but how large the failure will be. CCSP Domain 3 on resilience: the four failure scopes from instance to provider, the Uptime Institute's data center tiers and what each one guarantees, N+1 against 2N redundancy, the four cloud disaster recovery patterns from backup-and-restore to active-active, the recovery service level, and the shared responsibility for staying up.
Read article
Ciphertext-Only to Golden Ticket: The Thirteen Cryptanalytic Attacks CISSP Tests, and What Each One Actually Breaks
AES has never been broken and the CISSP knows it, which is why objective 3.7 is not about the math. It is about the nonce that repeated, the comparison that returned early, the certificate nobody validated and the hash that worked as well as the password. Every named cryptanalytic attack sorted by what the attacker holds, why 2DES failed, why a 128-bit hash gives only 64 bits of collision resistance, and the one countermeasure that belongs to each attack.
Read article
Kill Chain, Diamond Model, ATT&CK: Three Maps of the Same Attack, and When to Use Each
CySA+ gives you three frameworks for describing an attack and then asks which one fits the question. The Cyber Kill Chain's seven phases and where to break them, MITRE ATT&CK's tactics versus techniques and why the IDs matter, the Diamond Model's four vertices and how analysts pivot across them, all aligned on one intrusion so you can see what each map shows and hides.
Read article
Normal Is a Moving Target: Baselines, UEBA, the Base-Rate Fallacy, and How AI Security Tools Decide Something Is Wrong
A 99% accurate detector sounds like a solved problem until you run the numbers on a network where one event in ten thousand is malicious: nearly every alert it raises is wrong. SecAI+ objective 3.1 tests how AI-enabled tools decide something is abnormal. Baselining and UEBA, anomaly versus signature detection, supervised versus unsupervised detection, precision and recall, the base-rate arithmetic worked with real numbers, model drift, and the human review loop that makes any of it usable.
Read article
Roots of Trust: TPM, Secure Boot vs. Measured Boot, and the Trusted Computing Base
Every security control runs on something, and if that something is compromised the control is theater. CISSP Domain 3 on the hardware and firmware foundations: the trusted computing base and the reference monitor, protection rings, what a TPM actually stores and what a platform configuration register is for, why secure boot and measured boot answer different questions, and where trusted execution environments and hardware security modules fit.
Read article
Deepfakes, Voice Clones, and Machine-Speed Phishing: How AI Rewrites the Attacker's Playbook
AI did not invent a single new attack. It made every existing one cheaper, faster and personal. SecAI+ objective 3.2 in full: synthetic media and impersonation, misinformation versus disinformation, automated reconnaissance and data correlation, AI-written payloads and obfuscation, and the verification ladder that stops a cloned voice from moving money.
Read article
On-Prem to Serverless: Architecture Models, the Line That Moves, and the Twelve Considerations Security+ Scores Them By
Objective 3.1 reads like a glossary, but the exam never asks for a definition. It describes a workload, names a constraint, and asks which model fits or which risk you accepted. Every model as one decision about how much of the stack you control: the responsibility line from on-prem to SaaS, IaC, serverless and microservices, air gap versus VLAN versus SDN, hypervisor versus kernel, the devices you cannot patch, and the twelve considerations that turn a stem into a rubric.
Read article
Built to Survive: High Availability, Backups, and Power, the Half of Security+ Domain 3 Nobody Studies
Availability is the third letter of the triad and the objective candidates skim. Security+ 3.4 in full: load balancing and clustering, active-active versus active-passive, platform and geographic diversity, the full, incremental and differential trade-off drawn as a chart, snapshots, replication and journaling, UPS versus generator, and the capacity planning question the exam hides in a story about a hiring freeze.
Read article
Find It, Label It, Keep Control After It Leaves: Data Discovery, Classification, and IRM on the CCSP Exam
The register lists twelve regulated datasets; the first estate-wide scan finds a thirteenth in a bucket nobody owns. CCSP objectives 2.4 to 2.6: matching the discovery technique to structured, unstructured and semi-structured data, why cloud discovery must be continuous, classification versus categorization and who decides, tags as a control surface, and information rights management, the control that keeps working after the file has legitimately left.
Read article
Block, Object, Ephemeral, Archive: Cloud Storage Architectures and the Threat Each One Invites
Cloud data does not live in one place, and CCSP Domain 2 expects you to know the difference between the places. Block versus object versus file storage and which service model uses which, ephemeral storage and why it disappears, archival tiers and the retrieval delay nobody budgets for, raw device access, and the characteristic threat and control for each architecture.
Read article
Credentialed or Not, Agent or Agentless: How to Choose the Scan Before You Read the Report
The most expensive vulnerability report is the one that scanned the wrong way. CySA+ objectives 2.1 and 2.2: internal versus external, credentialed versus non-credentialed and why the difference is thousands of findings, agent versus agentless, active versus passive, the frameworks that dictate scan scope, and how to read Nmap's open, closed and filtered without guessing.
Read article
Open, Filtered, Plugin Output: Reading Nmap, Nessus, and Nikto Line by Line the Way CySA+ Expects
A scanner does not report facts. It reports claims, each resting on a specific piece of evidence, and a Critical built on a version banner arrives in the same red as one built on a working exploit. CySA+ objective 2.2 puts the output in front of you and asks what it means. Nmap states and NSE scripts, the anatomy of a Nessus finding, Nikto and Burp output, and the evidence test that separates a true positive from a false one.
Read article
Clear, Purge, Destroy: Data Remanence, Sanitization, and End-of-Life the CISSP Way
Deleted data is not gone, and the CISSP asks about the difference in a dozen ways. Domain 2 on what happens after the useful life of data and the assets that hold it: remanence and why deletion is a lie, the clear, purge and destroy ladder and which media each applies to, cryptographic erasure and the SSD problem, end-of-life versus end-of-support, and the ownership roles that decide who is accountable at every step.
Read article
Owner, Custodian, Controller, Processor: CISSP Data Classification, the Roles That Decide It, and the Handling Each Label Demands
When 61% of a file store is marked Confidential, the label has stopped meaning anything, and CISSP Domain 2 tests whether you can see why. The government and commercial classification schemes, the criteria that drive a grade, the roles from data owner to data subject and which one is accountable for what, labeling versus marking, the handling matrix that turns a label into storage, transmission, transport and destruction rules, the three data states with the control for each, and declassification.
Read article
The AI Gateway: Prompt Firewalls, Token Limits, and the Four Access Planes Every AI System Needs
Nearly every AI security control the exam names lives in one place. SecAI+ objectives 2.2 and 2.3 explained through the gateway: prompt firewalls and templates, rate, token, quota and modality limits, model versus gateway controls, the four access planes (model, data, agent, API), and why a guardrail you have never tested is a hope.
Read article
Ransomware, Rootkits, and Logic Bombs: Malware Types and the Indicators Security+ Expects You to Spot
Objective 2.4 is the longest list in Security+ and the one that turns into the most scenario questions. Malware classified by how it spreads and what it does, the attack families beyond malware, and the nine indicators of malicious activity, from impossible travel to missing logs, that tell you which attack a stem is describing before you read the answers.
Read article
Where the Data Lives: Minimization, Anonymization, Differential Privacy, and Federated Learning as SecAI+ Data Security Controls
An AI application moves sensitive data through more places than any traditional app: training sets, model weights, embeddings, vector stores, context windows, prompt logs. SecAI+ objective 2.4 asks which control belongs at each place. Minimization and PII scrubbing before training, anonymization versus pseudonymization, what differential privacy's epsilon actually buys, federated learning, synthetic data, confidential computing, and why embeddings and prompt logs are sensitive data too.
Read article
SOC 2, ISO 27017, CSA STAR, FIPS 140-3: How to Read a Cloud Provider's Proof
A cloud provider will not let you audit its data center, so it hands you a stack of reports instead. CCSP Domain 1 tests whether you can read them: SOC 1, 2 and 3 and why Type II is the one that matters, the ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018 family, the three levels of CSA STAR, product certifications like FIPS 140-3 and Common Criteria, and the scope statements and user entity controls that decide what a report actually proves.
Read article
Reflected or Amplified, Spraying or Brute Force: The Non-Malware Attacks Security+ Asks You to Name From the Indicators
Objective 2.4 is the biggest objective in Domain 2 and it runs in reverse: the stem hands you an indicator and asks for the attack. Beyond malware, that means five families sorted by target: physical, network, application, cryptographic and password. Each family taken to the discriminator the exam tests, reflected versus amplified, replay versus credential replay versus forgery, spraying versus brute force, collision versus birthday, then the nine indicators reversed into the attacks they point to.
Read article
The Analyst's Toolkit: Which Tool Answers Which Question, From Wireshark to YARA
CySA+ objective 1.3 lists eighteen tools and the exam never asks what any of them is. It asks which one you reach for. The toolkit sorted by the question each tool answers: packet capture versus flow analysis, Snort and Suricata rule anatomy, SIEM correlation, EDR against the wire, the file analysis chain from Strings to YARA, and the workflow that turns a suspicious attachment into a hunt.
Read article
Security+ SY0-701 vs SY0-801: Every Change in the Draft Objectives, and Which Exam to Take
CompTIA's draft SY0-801 objectives are out, the exam is expected to open this autumn, and SY0-701 retires on June 11, 2027. Built from the two objectives documents themselves: the weight shifts, the new AI objective, what moved between domains, what was dropped, and a decision rule for which exam to book.
Read article
STRIDE, PASTA, DREAD, and Attack Trees: Threat Modeling the Way CISSP Tests It
Threat modeling questions on the CISSP are not about drawing diagrams. They are about knowing which method answers which question. STRIDE and the security property each letter attacks, data flow diagrams and trust boundaries, PASTA's seven stages, DREAD as a scoring rubric, attack trees with their AND and OR gates, and the attacker-centric versus asset-centric distinction that decides half the scenarios.
Read article
Portability, Interoperability, Reversibility: Where Vendor Lock-In Hides, and the CCSP Design Principles That Get You Out
A provider's availability figure is true and the design is still wrong, because nobody asked how long the business could be down. CCSP objective 1.4 on secure cloud design: the BIA that sets RTO, RPO and RSL before any technology is chosen, the three failure scopes of cloud BCDR, why lock-in and lock-out are security requirements, the four places lock-in hides, how the security job moves between IaaS, PaaS and SaaS, and what DevOps security has to look like.
Read article
The AI Lifecycle, Secured: Where Controls Belong From Business Case to Feedback Loop
Most AI security failures were decided months before launch, at a stage nobody thought of as security. SecAI+ objective 1.3 end to end: the nine lifecycle stages, the one security question each stage has to answer, why a defect caught at collection is a hundred times cheaper than one caught in production, and the three kinds of human oversight the exam distinguishes.
Read article
Feeds, Confidence, and the Pyramid of Pain: Threat Intelligence and Threat Hunting the Way CySA+ Tests Them
A sharing group sends a report with no hash to block and no signature to deploy, only a description of how the adversary works. Turning that into detection is CySA+ objective 1.4. Threat actor types, where intelligence comes from and how much of it to believe, the intelligence cycle, STIX and TAXII, the Pyramid of Pain, and why a threat hunt starts from the opposite assumption to a monitoring rule.
Read article
Introducing the Interactive MITRE ATT&CK Matrix: Every Tactic and Technique, Clickable and Explained
The official ATT&CK site is a reference. We built a place to learn it: all 15 tactics, 222 techniques and 475 sub-techniques, each clickable, with plain-English detail, what a defender sees, where it lands on your exam, three worked attack stories that walk the matrix left to right, and a tactic drill. Free, no sign-up.
Read article
Administrative, Criminal, Civil, Regulatory: CISSP Investigation Types, Burden of Proof, and What Makes Evidence Admissible
The first hour of an investigation decides which investigation types are still possible, and CISSP Domain 1 tests that direction relentlessly. The five investigation types with who leads each and the standard of proof it must meet, beyond reasonable doubt against preponderance of evidence, the four evidence types, the three tests for admissibility, best evidence and hearsay, chain of custody, and the legal landscape the outline names from intellectual property to export controls and transborder data flow.
Read article
Approval, Backout, Maintenance Window: Why Security+ Calls Change Management a Security Control
Change management reads like an IT operations topic until you notice where CompTIA put it: Domain 1, beside the control types and the CIA triad. Objective 1.3 in full: the business process from request to documentation, who owns a change versus who is affected by it, the seven technical implications and the question each one forces, why a patch is not a fix until the service restarts, and the version control habit that turns every change into evidence.
Read article
Narrow vs. General, Discriminative vs. Generative: The AI Taxonomy SecAI+ Tests, and the Attack Each Branch Invites
SecAI+ objective 1.1 looks like a vocabulary list, and candidates study it as one. It is a taxonomy, and the exam uses it to predict attacks. Narrow versus general, discriminative versus generative, the four learning signals, the technique families from NLP to agents, and why a classifier gets evasion, a generative model gets injection, and a reinforcement agent gets reward hacking.
Read article
The Control Matrix: Four Categories, Six Types, and the Security+ Question You Will See Five Times
Every Security+ exam opens with the same trap: a control described in a sentence, and four answers that are all real words. Objective 1.1 as a grid: the four categories that say who implements a control, the six types that say what it does, why compensating and corrective are not the same thing, and the verb-spotting method that answers the question in ten seconds.
Read article
CVSS, EPSS and KEV: Cutting 61,000 Findings Down to This Week's Work
Severity is not priority. What CVSS actually measures and the two metric groups almost nobody applies, how EPSS turns severity into probability, why the CISA KEV catalog ends most arguments, and a prioritization funnel that survives contact with a real vulnerability queue. CySA+ CS0-004 Domain 2.
Read article
The Cloud Data Lifecycle: Six Phases, and the Control That Belongs to Each
Cloud Data Security is the heaviest domain on the CCSP at 20%, and the lifecycle is its spine. The six phases and the control each one wants, why data dispersion makes residency questions hard, how to pick between encryption, tokenization, masking and anonymization, and why the destroy phase is the one you cannot actually perform.
Read article
MTD, RTO, RPO: The Continuity Numbers, and the BIA That Sets Them
Business continuity questions on the CISSP look like arithmetic and are really about authority. What a BIA actually produces, how MTD, RTO, RPO and WRT sit on one timeline, why the recovery target is never the security team's to set, and the ordering rules that decide most exam questions.
Read article
SOC Triage: Turning 40,000 Alerts Into the Handful That Matter
Security Operations is 34% of CySA+ CS0-004, and almost all of it is triage. How telemetry becomes an alert, what the true/false positive quadrant costs you, why the Pyramid of Pain decides which indicators are worth detecting, when to hunt instead of wait, and where AI helps in a SOC without being trusted.
Read article
The Shared Responsibility Model, and the Key-Custody Question It Doesn't Answer
Where the line falls between you and your cloud provider changes with every service model, but accountability never moves. A CCSP deep dive on the responsibility split across IaaS, PaaS and SaaS, the roles vocabulary the exam tests, key custody from provider-managed through BYOK to HYOK, and why crypto-shredding only works if the key was never theirs.
Read article
Bell-LaPadula, Biba, and Clark-Wilson: The CISSP Security Models, Made Concrete
The formal security models are the part of CISSP Domain 3 that candidates memorize and then misread under time pressure. What each model was actually built to protect: the lattice, no read up and no write down, Biba's mirror image, the Clark-Wilson access triple, Brewer-Nash, and how the exam turns them into scenarios.
Read article
Secure Network Architecture: Zones, Device Placement, Firewalls vs. IDS/IPS, and Secure Protocols
Where you put a control decides what it can do. A Security+ deep dive on network design: security zones and the screened subnet, inline vs. tap and active vs. passive placement, fail-open and fail-closed, the four firewall generations, IDS vs. IPS, and the secure protocol and port swaps the exam expects on sight.
Read article
Monitoring and Auditing AI Systems: Prompt Logs, Drift, and Cost as a Security Signal
An AI system can be perfectly healthy and completely wrong. SecAI+ objective 2.5 end to end: what to collect at each layer, how to protect prompt logs that are now crown-jewel data, detecting drift before your users do, auditing for hallucination and bias, and reading token spend as attack telemetry.
Read article
Identity & Access Management: MFA, SSO, Federation, and the Principle That Ties Them Together
Identity is the real perimeter, and Security+ knows it. Objective 4.6 end to end: the four authentication factors, MFA and passkeys, SAML vs. OAuth vs. OIDC, federation and SSO, the provisioning lifecycle, access control models, and privileged access management.
Read article
AI Red Teaming: Evasion Attacks, Jailbreak Testing, and Proving a Model Is Safe
Functional testing tells you a model works. Red teaming tells you how it breaks. A deep dive for CompTIA SecAI+: adversarial evasion attacks, systematic jailbreak testing, the red-team methodology, and why 'we tested it and it was fine' is the most dangerous sentence in AI security.
Read article
Threat Actors & Social Engineering: Motivations, Capability, and the Human Attack Surface
Who attacks you, why, and how they get in through people. Security+ SY0-701 objectives 2.1 and 2.2: nation-states through script kiddies, insider threats and shadow IT, plus the full social engineering playbook, pretexting, BEC, vishing, watering holes, and the psychology that makes them work.
Read article
Securing Agentic AI: Excessive Agency, Tool Permissions, and the Human in the Loop
The moment an AI can act (send the email, run the query, call the API) every prompt-injection problem becomes an operations problem. Agentic AI security for CompTIA SecAI+: the agent loop, the three excesses of OWASP LLM06, the lethal trifecta, and the permission architecture that keeps agents useful without handing them the keys.
Read article
Incident Response, Explained: The Lifecycle, Digital Forensics, and the Order of Volatility
When the breach is real, process beats heroics. Incident response for Security+ SY0-701: the full NIST-style lifecycle from preparation to lessons learned, tabletop exercises, root cause analysis, plus digital forensics, legal hold, chain of custody, and the order of volatility.
Read article
Securing the AI Supply Chain: Poisoned Models, Malicious Pickles, and Provenance
Your AI system is mostly other people's work: base models from public hubs, scraped datasets, ML libraries, and plugins. A deep dive into AI supply chain attacks for CompTIA SecAI+: model serialization exploits, backdoored and typosquatted models, dataset tampering, and the provenance controls that hold.
Read article
PKI & Digital Certificates Explained: Chains of Trust, Revocation, and the TLS Handshake
The padlock in your browser rests on a global trust machine. PKI for Security+ SY0-701: key pairs and digital signatures, X.509 certificates and CSRs, root vs. intermediate CAs, wildcard and SAN certs, CRL vs. OCSP, and what actually happens in a TLS handshake.
Read article
Zero Trust Architecture Explained: Control Plane, Data Plane, and the End of the Perimeter
Never trust, always verify, but what does that actually mean in an architecture? Zero Trust for Security+ SY0-701: the control plane and data plane, Policy Engine, PEP, adaptive identity, microsegmentation, and the CISA maturity model.
Read article
AI Model Theft Explained: Extraction, Inversion, and Membership Inference
Attackers don't need your weights file to steal your model. How model extraction, model inversion, and membership inference attacks work through a normal prediction API, and the defenses CompTIA SecAI+ expects you to know.
Read article
Risk Management by the Numbers: SLE, ALE, ARO & the Risk Register
The quantitative risk toolkit on Security+: single loss expectancy, annualized loss expectancy, and annualized rate of occurrence, with a worked example, plus risk registers, appetite vs. tolerance, and the four risk responses. Core SY0-701 Domain 5 material.
Read article
From Scan to Patch: The Vulnerability Management Lifecycle, Explained
How vulnerability management actually works end to end: discovery methods, CVE vs. CVSS, prioritizing with environment and exposure, remediation vs. compensating controls, and validating the fix. Deep-dive material for Security+ SY0-701 Domain 4.
Read article
Encryption, Hashing, Tokenization, Masking: How Data Protection Actually Works
The complete Security+ data-protection toolkit, explained properly: the three states of data, what each method (encryption, hashing, tokenization, masking, obfuscation, segmentation) actually does, and how to pick the right one. Core material for SY0-701 Domain 3.
Read article
AI Governance, Risk & Compliance: Structures, Risks & Regulations (SecAI+ Domain 4)
AI governance structures and roles, the risks of AI and the Responsible AI principles that counter them, and the compliance landscape: EU AI Act, OECD, ISO, and the NIST AI RMF. An objective-by-objective guide to CompTIA SecAI+ Domain 4.
Read article
AI-Assisted Security: Tools, AI-Enabled Attacks & Automation (SecAI+ Domain 3)
How security teams use AI-enabled tools, how attackers weaponize AI (deepfakes, automated attack generation), and how to automate security work safely. A practical, objective-by-objective guide to CompTIA SecAI+ Domain 3 (AI-assisted Security).
Read article
MITRE ATLAS, Explained: The Threat Matrix for AI Systems
MITRE ATLAS is the adversarial threat knowledge base for machine-learning systems: the AI-native cousin of ATT&CK. What it is, how its tactics progress, and how it fits alongside OWASP and NIST for CompTIA SecAI+.
Read article
How to Secure a RAG System: Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Defended
Retrieval-augmented generation is the most common enterprise AI pattern, and it quietly turns your knowledge base into an attack surface. A clear walkthrough of how RAG works, where it breaks, and the defenses that hold, mapped to CompTIA SecAI+.
Read article
Data Poisoning Attacks on AI: How They Work and How to Defend
Data poisoning corrupts an AI model by tampering with its training data, sometimes planting a hidden backdoor. Here's how the attack works, the main types, real examples, and the defenses that matter for SecAI+.
Read article
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF), Explained Simply
The NIST AI RMF in plain language. Its four core functions (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage), what each one does, and why it anchors the governance domain of CompTIA SecAI+.
Read article
The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, Explained
A plain-English walkthrough of the OWASP Top 10 risks for LLM applications: what each one means, a real example, and the defense that actually works. Essential reading for SecAI+ Domain 2.
Read article
How Large Language Models Actually Work, A Security Professional's Primer
You can't secure what you don't understand. A clear, jargon-light mental model of how LLMs work: tokens, attention, training vs. inference, and exactly where each part becomes an attack surface.
Read article
How Long Does It Take to Study for CompTIA SecAI+?
A realistic timeline for preparing for the CompTIA SecAI+ exam, based on your starting point, study pace, and how you study.
Read article
Prompt Injection Explained: The Top LLM Security Risk
Prompt injection is the number-one security risk for LLM apps. Here's how it works, why it's so hard to stop, and what it means for the SecAI+ exam.
Read article
Is CompTIA SecAI+ Worth It? Who Should Get the AI Security Certification
Wondering whether CompTIA SecAI+ is worth your time and money? An honest look at who benefits, what it proves, and the right time to take it.
Read article
SecAI+ vs Security+: Which Cybersecurity Certification Should You Take?
CompTIA SecAI+ and Security+ serve different goals. Here's how they compare, who each is for, and the order that makes the most sense.
Read article
How to Pass CompTIA SecAI+ (CY0-001): A Practical Study Plan
A focused, domain-by-domain study plan for the CompTIA SecAI+ exam: what to prioritize, how to use practice questions, and how to avoid the common traps.
Read article
What Is CompTIA SecAI+? The New AI Security Certification, Explained
CompTIA SecAI+ (CY0-001) is CompTIA's new certification for securing AI. Here's what it covers, who it's for, the exam format, and how to start preparing.
Read article